The eyes of Australia are on an important defamation trial which got under way in the Federal Court in Sydney on Monday. The trial, which is to be heard by a judge alone without a jury, has been described in the media as the trial of the century.

The Ben Roberts-Smith’s defamation case in Sydney has it all – it’s a battle between two media giants, an extension of the culture wars and, crucially, a chance to learn more about Australian forces’ misconduct in Afghanistan.

The plaintiff Ben Roberts-Smith, is a 42-year-old Australian war hero who was awarded the Victoria Cross and the Medal for Gallantry for his military service with the Special Air Service Regiment in Afghanistan between 2006 and 2012.

The Victoria Cross is Australia’s highest military honor and is awarded for “conspicuous bravery in the field.” Roberts-Smith won his for his part in an attack on a Taliban stronghold, and his bravery and courage under fire are not in dispute.

Roberts-Smith is suing The Age, the Sydney Morning Herald, and the Canberra Times newspapers over a series of articles in 2018 that accused him of committing six unlawful killings while serving in Afghanistan.

The alleged victims include a disabled man and a child. At the time of publication, all three papers were owned by Nine Entertainment.

The defendants have raised a defense of truth, and propose to call Australian soldiers who served with Roberts-Smith in Afghanistan and other witnesses to testify that the plaintiff committed these atrocities.

Understandably, the Roberts-Smith defamation action has attracted a great deal of publicity and commentary. The plaintiff is Australia’s most highly decorated living soldier, and the son of a former Western Australian Supreme Court judge.

After leaving the army in 2013, Roberts-Smith became general manager of Seven Queensland, part of Seven West Media in Brisbane  – a commercial rival of the media conglomerate that published the articles he has sued on.

Seven West Media is controlled by billionaire media tycoon Kerry Stokes, who is also coincidentally chairman of the Australian War Memorial in Canberra – the national institution established in 1941 to commemorate and honor the members of Australia’s armed forces (living and dead) who participated in the killing fields.

Stokes has agreed to fund Roberts-Smith’s defamation action and has already advanced him almost $2 million for that purpose. Stokes has been criticized for this by politically correct commentators in the media, but has brushed these attacks aside.

The Roberts-Smith defamation action arose out of media investigations into allegations of serious misconduct by Australian troops during their deployment in Afghanistan.

The resultant adverse publicity forced the federal government to appoint Major-General Paul Brereton to investigate the claims that war crimes had been committed.

Brereton handed down his report late last year – finding that there was sufficient evidence to suggest that 25 soldiers may have committed 39 murders in Afghanistan. It is not clear whether Roberts-Smith is one of the 25 accused soldiers.

Brereton’s findings gave rise to a firestorm of adverse publicity about the conduct of Australian troops in Afghanistan.

The chief of the Australian Defense Force, General Angus Campbell, stripped 3,000 soldiers who had served in Afghanistan of their service medals, although this decision was subsequently overturned – and the prime minister gave a formal apology to the president of Afghanistan and the Afghan people.

The federal government established a further inquiry to make final determinations, as recommended by Brereton, earlier this year – but the issue has received little or no media attention for the last five months.

Whatever the outcome of this latest battle in the culture wars, there is no doubt that the Roberts-Smith defamation trial will shine a spotlight on the alleged misconduct of several Australian troops in Afghanistan.

On this issue, the detailed evidence given by the plaintiff and his accusers in respect of the six specific murders that it is alleged Roberts-Smith committed will be crucial – and cross-examination will play an important part in determining the outcome.

Roberts-Smith will commence giving evidence on Wednesday, and the trial is expected to last for at least eight weeks.

RT. com / ABC Flash Point War Crimes Blog News 2021.

4.8 5 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
AwareAussie2
AwareAussie2
Guest
10-06-21 13:39

It will be a coverup of the century… not a trial of the century. They will use privacy and national security laws to filter out all the real juicy stuff, and what is left will be for damage control, public placation, and entertainment and distraction only. All the stuff they will release has likely already been pre-filtered and determined.

APB
APB
Guest
Reply to  AwareAussie2
10-06-21 13:40

comment image?w=1024&s=810c8e45fa37ec5a9182cca0445e1999

TrishArch
TrishArch
Guest
10-06-21 13:40

It already is being covered up. We’ll be lucky to see it on the nightly news. And without a Jury of his Peers to convict. Well we already know the outcome. Ben Roberts-Smith must be sent to The Hague to face War Crimes