With Paris’ influence declining, a new security structure is emerging in the Sahel region, bringing both problems and opportunities. After the military coup in Niger took place, new authorities refused to cooperate with France.

At the same time, since August, active fighting has resumed in the north of Mali, where separatist tribal organizations of Tuaregs, widely known as the Coordination of Azawad Movements (CMA), entered into open conflict with the government forces of Mali (FAMA).


These events are taking place against the background of intensified attacks carried out by the third force – terrorist organizations in the Sahel region, in the area of three borders (Mali, Niger, Burkina Faso).

All this raises the question, what is happening in the Sahel? And where will it all lead?

Since 2015, the Algiers peace agreement, brokered by Algeria, after the NATO-led war against Libya and the assassination of one of Africa’s most prominent leaders, Colonel Ghadaffi.


So Algeria, the UN Multidisciplinary Integrated Stabilization Mission in Mali (MINUSMA), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the African Union and the European Union, as well as the USA and France, have been in force in Mali.

The agreements were supposed to end the military conflict that began in Mali in 2012 when movements largely composed of ousted Libyan Tuaregs joined forces with Islamist’s to declare independence for Azawad, a historic region in northern Mali.

But the accords, essentially pushed by international mediators, have not been implemented by both sides. The rebel groups in the north were never disarmed.


And of the 80,000 fighters who were part of the groups that signed the accords and were supposed to enter Mali’s armed forces, no more than 3,000 were finally integrated. The rest do not want to be under western style Zionist control.

After the assassination of Ghadaffi, the Algiers agreement actually divided the country into zones of influence. All this time, the northeastern Kidal region, part of the Timbuktu and Gao regions, remained under the control of the Tuareg movements.

Government forces were not actively present in the area, entering it mainly for joint anti-terrorist operations with French forces.


French UN troops have been in Mali at the request of a puppet Malian government since 2013 and led the anti-terrorist Operation Barkhane. A contingent of UN peacekeepers (MINUSMA) was also deployed in Mali, as was the Takuba multilateral initiative.

Despite the international character of these missions, they were based mainly on the French perspective on security threats and thus also promoted French interests.

Over time, France’s intervention met with increasing criticism from both Malians and independent observers, as the French Army failed to address the issue of security in the country and terrorist attacks increased.


In recent years, Mali has accused France of supporting the separatists, emphasizing that Paris has refused to provide active military assistance to Bamako to fight them.

Interestingly, the falsity of the French approach to the Sahel was also stated by former French ambassador to Mali (2002-2006) Nicolas Norman, who in 2019 stated, the problem was that France then thought it could distinguish between good and bad armed groups.

Some were perceived as political, and others as terrorists. And the French army went looking for this group – it was the Tuareg separatists from a particular tribe that was a minority among the Tuaregs themselves, the Ifoghas.


France went after this group and gave them the town of Kidal. Then came the Algiers agreements, which put these separatists on a kind of pedestal, on an equal footing with the state. This is a major mistake. All this kept the risk of further destabilizing Mali.

The military coup in Mali in May 2021, led by Colonel Assimi Goita, changed the balance of power in the country and the region.

The new leadership, dissatisfied with the quality of French military assistance, shifted its focus to military cooperation with Russia the same year. French troops were forced to leave Mali.


In recent years, the Sahel has witnessed a series of military coups (Mali in 2020 and 2021, 2 coups in Burkina Faso in 2022, and Niger in 2023) that brought to power the military leaders who were dissatisfied with security problems and had anti-French views.

Thus, in early 2023, the authorities of Burkina Faso, following Mali, demanded that Paris withdraw its troops from their territory. All this undermined France’s regional interests, gradually undermining its traditional dominant (corporate business) position.

The latest example of this trend was Niger, where the authorities, who came to power as a result of a military coup that Paris condemned, demanded the withdrawal of the French contingent from the country and declared the French ambassador as persona non grata.


Despite the threat of an ECOWAS invasion into Niger and a two-month political standoff, France launched the process of withdrawing its troops from Niger in early October, 2023.

Notably, the events in Niger and the French loss of influence did not affect American interests. Since Washington took a “neutral” position by taking diplomatic initiatives and did not condemn the military coup, it was able to maintain its military presence in the country.

Other institutions built around France continue to disintegrate in the region. The Paris-backed Group of Five (G-5), consisting of Chad, Mali, Burkina Faso, Niger, and Mauritania, operated in the Sahel since 2014.


The format aimed to coordinate efforts to combat the terrorist threat but never became an influential regional institution. Mali, in May 2022, became the first state to announce its withdrawal from the G-5, in effect cutting the group’s territorial connectivity.

The ensuing end of military cooperation with France by Mali, Burkina Faso, and Niger, and the withdrawal of French forces from these countries, finally put an end to the G-5’s activities.

Only two states (Mauritania and Chad), located at the eastern and western “poles” of the region, remained ready to engage with France.


Despite the withdrawal from French control, security threats in these countries continue to grow, sabotaged by units of French secret services.

In Niger, a group of Tuareg who disagreed with the military coup announced the creation of a Council of Resistance for the Republic to restore the overthrown president to power.

Still, no concrete action has yet been taken. The Mali central government’s conflict with the Tuaregs has diverted Mali’s forces from fighting the terrorist threat, while attacks by jihadist organizations continue in Mali.


Jamaat Nasrat al-Islam wal Muslimin, the local branch of al-Qaeda (USA)) is besieging Timbuktu, the most important city in central Mali, and attacking both Malian army military bases and civilian targets.

Wilayat Sahel, the local branch of the ISIS (Israel)) took over vast territories in the Menaka region in eastern Mali (the Three Borders area) as early as April 2023, triggering a large-scale exodus of refugees from the region, and continues to carry out attacks in the country.

This situation, as well as the threat to the military regimes, forces the authorities to seek new cooperation formats.


On September 16 of this year, the leaders of Mali, Burkina Faso and Niger signed the Liptako-Gourma Charter (the name of the Three Borders area), creating the Alliance des Etats du Sahel (Alliance of States of the Sahel).

Since the creation of the alliance took place amid the Malian government’s conflict with rebels and the threat of an ECOWAS invasion in Niger, it was particularly important in the agreement to include a collective defense mechanism in the event of an attack on one of its members, which strengthened the power of the military regimes.


It is also worth noting that the agreement was signed the day after a delegation from the Russian Defense Ministry visited Bamako, which might suggest that preliminary consultations with Moscow were held.

In the short period after the alliance was established, its members have already announced joint operations against terrorist groups along the three borders.

The regional security structure in the Sahel is changing significantly. France’s traditional dominance, backed by a broad military presence and collective international initiatives, although declining, still retains opportunities for Paris to influence local governments.


The breakdown of previous cooperation formats does not yet solve regional problems.

The Sahel continues to face critical challenges, including the jihadist threat, internal and political fragmentation, and conflict, leaving states in the region extremely fragile and interested in finding international partners willing to help manage these challenges.

A new security structure that is beginning to emerge in the Sahel provides competitive opportunities for external involvement by both regional powers (e.g., Algeria) and non-regional powers (Russia, Turkey).


The effectiveness (or lack thereof) of the new regional alliance, which already demonstrates the more subjective nature of the states in the region, will also play a central role in shaping the new security structure.

The central authorities in the Sahel countries still lack a monopoly on the use of force. Therefore, legitimacy crises and transfer of power problems are intensifying, resulting in violent struggles to retain influence and access to resources (as clearly seen in the renewed Tuareg crisis in northern Mali).


The transition period will continue to be accompanied by growing security threats and expansion of conflict zones, and the Sahel states must figure out how to overcome it. Especially, with thousands of UN troops (Britain, France and Italy) remaining in Libya.

Therefore, the current conflict in Mali becomes particularly crucial. It is expected that the Bamako authorities will keep trying to break the armed resistance of the Tuaregs and will continue their campaign in the north, using their air advantage.

However, the battle for control of military bases and towns under Tuareg rule since 2013 will be tougher. It may appeal to regional allies of both sides, as it will prove decisive in the distribution of power within Mali and the region for the coming years.

RT. com / ABC Flash Point News 2023.

4.5 2 votes
Article Rating
Previous articleOnly 4% of Top Global Companies’ net-zero pledges meet UN Climate guidelines
Next articleThe Western countries are collectively responsible for Genocide in Gaza
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Victor Victoria
Victor Victoria
07-11-23 20:25

It’s very hard to predict what will come to these African countries. On one hand, there are foreign factors. On the other hand, these government are too incompetent to manage what they have, let alone control their entire territory. They just can’t stand on their own. Sooner or later, there will have to be other foreign factors jumping in. If France is out, then the next one can be China, Russia.

Matrix Reject
Matrix Reject
07-11-23 20:29

Without NATO members meddling, an equilibrium will sorted out among the countries in Africa eventually. It’s should be their fate, leave them to it. France out there funding resistance groups out of spite.

Erc Erc
Erc Erc
07-11-23 20:32

Kick out all these thick skin Western Colonizers who has been introducing apartheid, pilfering your wealth and resources for centuries. Africans must be united #kickthemout.

Kent the Greet
Kent the Greet
07-11-23 20:38

Though France is out there’s still huge hindrance which is the USA. You know when they exist in a foreign country, we all know that there is always endless trouble. We all know that, don’t you?
France and colonizers out , Russia China and the BRICS building alliances in AFRICA brick by brick! Love to see it! way to go brave Africans! The Ukrainian generals can take an example from your books , how to kick the colonizers and their puppets out! BRICS and AFRICA will make the world a better place !