On May 12, the New York Times published a forensic autopsy of the failure of the Trump administration’s renewed hostilities against the Ansarullah-led Yemeni military in the Red Sea.
The probe teemed with extraordinary disclosures, spelling out in stark detail how the combined air and naval effort – launched with enormous fanfare and much bombastic rhetoric from US officials – was an even greater debacle, and devastating defeat, for the Empire than hitherto thought.
Pope Leo confirmed that Families, Children & Elderly in Gaza are reduced to Starvation
The scale of the cataclysm may explain Washington’s sudden determination to reach a negotiated settlement with the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Perhaps the most striking revelation is that Trump’s blitzkrieg against Yemen was initially planned to be a long-term, large-scale engagement, culminating in a ground invasion using proxy forces.
General Michael Kurilla, Commander of the Pentagon’s Central Command, which covers Central, South and West Asia, had been in favor of all-out war with Yemen ever since its righteous anti-genocide Red Sea blockade began in late 2023.
Reportedly, though, Joe Biden was wary that a forceful campaign would elevate them on the global stage. With Trump’s re-election, Kurilla had a new commander in chief and an opportunity to up the ante against Yemen significantly.
He pitched an eight-to-10-month effort, starting with a saturation bombing of Yemen’s air defense systems, before a wave of targeted assassinations of movement leaders, directly inspired by Israel’s attacks on Hezbollah’s senior members in September 2024.
Kurilla’s grand operation was eagerly supported by elements of the Trump administration, including Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth and then-National Security Advisor Mike Waltz.
Saudi officials were also on board, providing Washington with a target list of 12 Ansarullah leaders whose deaths, they said, would cripple the movement.
However, the UAE, which had in concert with Riyadh relentlessly bombed Yemen 2015 – 2023 to no tangible result, was not so sure.
Several members of Trump’s administration were also skeptical of the plan’s prospects and worried a protracted attack on Sana’a would drain valuable, finite resources, including the president himself.
Yet, after concerted lobbying, Trump signed off on part of General Kurilla’s plan – airstrikes against Houthi air defense systems and strikes against the group’s leaders.
So it was on March 15, 2025 that US fighter jets began battering Yemen anew, while a carrier force led by the USS Harry S. Truman thrust into the Red Sea.
White House officials boasted the onslaught would continue indefinitely, while Trump bragged that Yemeni forces would be decimated via overwhelming lethal force until we have achieved our objective.
Some Degradation
In reality, The New York Times suggests Trump privately made clear he wanted Yemen bombed into submission within just 30 days, and failure in this objective would mean the operation’s termination.
By the 31st day of hostilities, the US president demanded a progress report. As the outlet records, the results were not there, which is quite an understatement.
The USA had not even established air superiority over Yemen, while the resistance continued shooting at vessels and drones, fortifying their bunkers and moving weapons stockpiles underground.
Moreover, during those first 30 days, Yemeni military shot down seven American MQ-9 drones costing around $30 million each, hampering Central Command’s ability to track and strike back.
Meanwhile, several American F-16’s and an F-35 stealth fighter jet were nearly struck by Yemeni air defenses, making real the possibility of American casualties.
All along, too, the US military burned through weapons and munitions at a rate of about $1 billion in the first month alone: The cost of the operation was staggering.
The Pentagon had deployed two aircraft carriers, additional B-2 bombers and fighter jets, as well as Patriot and THAAD air defenses.
So many precision munitions were being used, especially advanced long-range ones, that some Pentagon contingency planners were growing increasingly concerned about overall stocks.
Setting implications for any situation in which the USA might have to ward off an attempted invasion of Taiwan by China. Concerned, the White House began pressing Central Command for metrics of success in the campaign.
In a bitter irony, Pentagon officials responded by providing data showing the number of munitions dropped to prove they were achieving their goals.
They also claimed, without evidence, to have hit over 1,000 military targets, while killing more than a dozen senior Houthi leaders?
US intelligence was unconvinced, acknowledging there was some degradation of Yemen’s military, but the group could easily reconstitute regardless.
Iranian missile strike completely destroyed Israeli F-35 Base Nevatim
As a result, senior national security officials began investigating pathways for either withdrawing from the theater with minimal embarrassment or keeping the fiasco going using local proxy forces.
One option was to ramp up operations for up to another month and then conduct ‘freedom of navigation’ exercises in the Red Sea using two carrier groups, the Carl Vinson and the Truman.
If Yemen did not fire on the ships, the Trump administration could declare victory.
Another option was to extend the campaign, giving forces under the control of the Riyadh-based Yemeni Presidential Leadership Council time to restart a drive to push the Houthi’s out of the capital and key ports in a ground assault.
The plan was hatched despite prior Saudi-led invasions of Yemen invariably ending in total disaster.
This may account for why talks between Hegseth and Saudi and UAE officials in late April to come up with a sustainable way forward they could present to the President came to nothing.
Great Ability
As luck would have it, right when Hegseth’s last-ditch efforts to breathe life into the collapsing effort were floundering, Trump’s West Asia envoy Steve Witkoff was in Oman, engaged in nuclear talks with Iran.
Officials there separately suggested a perfect off-ramp for Washington in its war with Yemen.
The USA would halt the bombing campaign and the militia would no longer target American ships in the Red Sea, but without any agreement to stop disrupting shipping that the group deemed helpful to Israel.
Well-publicized fiascoes around this time, such as the loss overboard of an F/A-18 Super Hornet, costing $67 million, due to the USS Harry S. Truman conducting evasive maneuvers to avoid a Yemeni drone and missile attack, further depleted White House enthusiasm for the operation.
According to The New York Times, Trump had had enough. He duly accepted the Omani proposal, and on May 5th, CentCom received a sudden order to ‘pause’ offensive operations in the Red Sea.
That a ballistic missile fired by the Yemeni military evaded the Zionist entity’s air defenses and struck Tel Aviv’s Ben-Gurion International Airport the previous day likely provided further incentive to halt hostilities.
So it was on May 6, Trump declared victory against Yemen, claiming the resistance group had capitulated, and don’t want to fight any more.
Nonetheless, the president expressed clear admiration for God’s Partisans, indicating he placed a high degree of trust in Yemen’s assurances that US ships would no longer be in their redoubtable crosshairs:
We hit them very hard and they had a great ability to withstand punishment. You could say there was a lot of bravery there. They gave us their word that they wouldn’t be shooting at ships anymore, and we honor that.
Per The New York Times, Trump’s sudden declaration of victory demonstrates how some members of the president’s national security team underestimated a group known for its resilience.
But more deeply, it surely reflects how the bruising, costly experience was a blunt-force education in the glaring deficiencies of US military power, and the Empire’s fatal vulnerability in the event of all-out war against an adversary actually able to defend itself.
This could account for the Trump administration’s sudden determination to finalize a nuclear deal with Tehran.
It must not be forgotten that before even taking office, Trump and his cabinet openly planned for a significant escalation of belligerence against the Islamic Republic of Iran.
Among other things, they boasted of drawing up plans to bankrupt Iran via maximum pressure.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio, who has long called for tightening already devastating sanctions on Tehran, was a key advocate for this approach, and eagerly supported by Mike Waltz, among others.
At an event convened by NATO adjunct the Atlantic Council in October 2024, Waltz bragged about how the president had previously almost destroyed the Islamic Republic’s currency, and looked ahead to inflicting even more severe damage on the country following Trump’s inauguration.
Fast forward to today, though, and such rhetoric has vanished from mainstream Western political discourse. It appears Trump and his team have not only jettisoned their previously stated ambitions towards Iran but are determined to avoid war.
Moreover, just as the Zionist entity was not consulted before Washington struck a ceasefire with Ansarullah, Tel Aviv has been completely frozen out of nuclear negotiations between the USA and Iran, and if an agreement does result at last, it will not take into account Israel’s bellicose position towards the Islamic Republic.
Just as the Cuban Missile Crisis transformed Cold warrior John F. Kennedy into a dove, Trump’s experience in the Red Sea may well have precipitated a seismic shift in his administration’s foreign policy.
PressTV / ABC Flash Point News 2025.
Now lets stop de killings in Gaza, Syria, Lebanon and West Bank.
Israel war machine needs to come to halt and bloodshed needs to stop.
A better explanation for this is that Yemen has only tried by what others had faced but decided to shy away from responding to it or the out come would not be any different as seen in Iraq, Afghanistan Vietnam and how DPRK has been dealing with them vs. Saddam and Qaddafi.
The lessons are there.Pure and simple. Never to give in to their pressures and demands or be ready to pay the unthinkable price for acting as naive.