While there has been ample focus on China’s few but ever-larger aircraft carriers, comparatively little attention has been paid to a host of helicopter carriers and amphibious assault ships that pose a far greater danger to Taiwan.

The Type 075 landing helicopter dock (LHD) is almost as large as the aircraft carrier Liaoning and its larger sister ship, Type 001A, but the new vessel’s construction has been paid comparatively little attention.

While the assault ship can’t launch fixed-wing aircraft, it can carry dozens of helicopters as well as large detachments of marines and their landing craft, posing a potent threat to any maritime area.

The Type 075 ships are predicted to be roughly the same size as the Wasp-class ships, making them by far the largest such vessels operated by a non-American naval force.

The Diplomat notes that the initial Type 075 LHD’s are expected to weigh in at 31,000 tons’ displacement and carry 28 helicopters, but that a larger Type 075A is believed to be in the works, to the tune of 40,000 tons’ displacement and an air wing of 40 helicopters.

Sina Military noted the flight deck to be roughly 250 meters long and 32 meters wide, with at least six heavy takeoff points.

The US Marine Corps operates nine such vessels: eight 40,000-ton Wasp-class ships and one newer, 45,000-ton America-class vessel.

An LHD for the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN) has long been anticipated, ever since the eighth and final Type 071 landing platform dock (LPD) was announced.

These 25,000-ton warships are like LHD’s but without the flat top and hangars for aircraft, although they have a small landing platform on the stern of the ship.

The US operates a similar vessel, the San Antonio-class LPD.

It’s currently believed the three Type 075-class ships ordered are being assembled by Hudong Zhonghua, a subsidiary of China State Shipbuilding that operates out of Shanghai.

Numerous aerial, French satellite and on-the-ground photos support this thesis, showing two vessels with large well decks such as those required to perform amphibious dock duties being built side-by-side in the Hudong Zhonghua drydocks.

One glaring weakness the PLAN faces compared to the US Marine Corps is that it has no vertical takeoff fixed-wing or tilt-rotor aircraft, such as the V-22 Osprey or F-35B Lightning II, meaning it can only operate helicopters from the new carriers.

However, with Beijing readying a naval version of its new Z-20, the PLAN could soon have a potent anti-ship and anti-submarine aircraft.

The Pentagon has taken notice of the new assault fleet, even if the press hasn’t.

In the US Department of Defense’s annual China Military Power Report to Congress this past May, the Office of the Secretary of Defense told lawmakers that China’s navy “continues to develop into a global force.

This new naval fore gradually extends its operational reach beyond East Asia into a sustained ability to operate at increasingly longer world-wide ranges.

The Pentagon report also notes that “large-scale amphibious invasion is one of the most complicated and difficult military operations,” dependent upon a multitude of factors, from maintaining sea and air superiority as well as the ability to quickly build up and resupply forces on shore.

The Pentagon’s 2018 report on Chinese military capabilities noted Beijing’s plan to more than triple the size of the PLAN Marine Corps from two brigades to seven by 2020.

These naval brigades are giving the Chinese 30,000 marines and a vastly larger area of responsibility that includes security at overseas bases like that in Djibouti.

However, that’s still a tiny fraction compared to the US Marine Corps’ 186,000 war men and women under arms.

Sputnik / ABC Flash Point News 2019.

4 1 vote
Article Rating
Previous articleCaribbean Sea and Oil fields of Venezuela to be mapped again by Dutch military
Next articleUS Regime issues Warrant to Seize Iranian Grace 1 Oil Tanker released by UK
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Albert Heijn
Albert Heijn
22-08-20 17:45

Get those Zionist scum out of the area?