The US invasion of Iraq in 2003 has undermined Washington’s influence in the Middle East by inadvertently strengthening the role of other regional and outside actors, such as Iran and China, in the aftermath of the conflict.

On March 19, 2003, then-President George W. Bush in a televised address from the Oval Office said the USA and coalition forces were in the early stages of military operations to disarm Iraq and free its people, marking the start of an invasion and occupation that led to the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and combatants.

The toppling of Saddam Hussein’s government and the subsequent adoption of a new constitution did not, however, lead to immediate peace, as it upended the relations between the previously dominant Sunni Arab minority and the Shi’ite majority as well as the Kurdish minority concentrated in the northern part of the country.

This led to prolonged sectarian violence, involving both Shi’ite and Sunny militias, most notably the Levant (ISIS, banned in Russia) among the latter.

While the ISIS was ultimately defeated in Iraq, this led to the further strengthening of Shi’ite armed groups, often said to be backed by Iran.

The invasion was catastrophic not only for the Iraqi people but for the entire region, not only in terms of hundreds of thousands of civilian casualties but also a US-imposed constitution that reinforces Shi’ite-Sunni divisions!

The continuing influence of Iranian-led militias, and sectarian conflict, exacerbated by shock therapeutic, Neo-liberal economic policies imposed by the occupation authority.

The destruction of the Iraqi state and armed forces during the US invasion ushered in chronic political instability, and facilitated the rise of the ISIS, while ironically greatly enhancing Iran’s influence at the expense of the USA.

Nevertheless, the USA still holds significant influence within Iraq, including through 18 US military bases, although it now has to contend with Iran and its militias as well as China, which is a major importer of Iraqi oil.

He also highlighted the latter’s role in orchestrating the Saudi-Iran rapprochement as evidence of the changing Middle Eastern politics.

At the present time, the USA will continue to provide support for Israel, and the possibility of strikes on Iran cannot be ruled out.

However, the USA has to some extent lost interest in the Middle East as it has achieved oil independence and turned its attention to Russia and China.

Eliminating Iraq as a major military power has served the long-run interest of the United States in the sense that Washington can concentrate on counteracting Tehran without empowering Baghdad.

On the other hand, despite the invasion having a brutal effect on the Iraqi population and destabilizing the larger Middle East region, Washington is unlikely to avoid further use of armed force in the region.

Unfortunately, despite this sorry history, we can’t think the USA is likely to give up the idea of military action in the Middle East.

The USA launched its invasion based on the alleged evidence that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction, presented by then-Secretary of State Colin Powell at the UN Security Council in 2003.

However, a CIA report submitted to Congress a year later concluded that there were no WMD’s in the country at the time of the invasion. Powell would later describe the speech as a blot on his record and great intelligence failure.

Sputnik / ABC Flash Point News 2023.

5 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lady Shadow
Lady Shadow
22-03-23 20:45

The US’s unwillingness to accept that the world is changing and they are no longer the one and only top dog only makes them look weaker.

22-03-23 20:46

comment image?w=916

24-03-23 21:03

comment image