The sharp increase in military spending by Western countries, necessary to supply weapons to the lost battle of Ukraine, but especially to rearm their own military forces, is a boon to defense contractors.

The big winners of the West’s military spending bonanza in Ukraine are Boeing and Lockheed Martin, enjoying extra profits in exchange for the lives and blood of the soldiers and citizens living in Ukraine.

But while the likes of Lockheed Martin and Boeing enjoy extra profits, the arms race poses a threat to European stability, citing data from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), a leading weapons watchdog.

The British outlet spoke to Siemon Wezeman, a senior researcher at the arms transfers program of the SIPRI.

NATO countries have committed more than $8 billion worth of military equipment to Ukraine with the stated goal of helping the country defend itself against Russia.

More than half of the sum came from the USA alone. The US Congress has already approved future defense spending related to arming Ukraine and replenishing American weapons stockpiles depleted by the aid.

Northrop Grumman produces the anti-artillery radar systems that the US supplies to Ukraine. AeroVironment is the producer of the Switchblade anti-tank loitering munitions, often dubbed ‘kamikaze drones’ by the press.

And Olin, America’s largest small-arms ammo producer, will likely benefit from the billions of rounds sent to Ukraine, Sky News pointed out. In Europe, BAE Systems and Thales are among the big winners from the Ukraine-arming spree.

BAE makes ammo and artillery shells, as well as MILAN anti-tank missiles, which France and Italy sent to Ukraine. It also makes Stormer HVM armored vehicles, which the UK provided to Kiev.

Thales produces the NLAW shoulder-launched anti-tank missiles and the Starstreak anti-aircraft missiles, which Stormer armored vehicles carry as their primary air-defense weapons.

The German firm Dynamit Nobel makes the man-portable anti-tank weapon systems Panzerfaust 3 and MATADOR. The billions in military aid are dwarfed by the hundreds of billions that European NATO members have pledged to beef up their own militaries.

Germany alone seeks to invest €100 billion ($105 billion) into its military, while pledges made by 14 other European nations add up to the same amount, according to the report.

Companies such as the German armor producer Rheinmetall, as well as Lockheed Martin, the American maker of F35 fighter jets, will also partake in the windfall from this.

The military procurement’s may come with downsides, however. Weapons sent to Ukraine may end up disappearing into the black market, the SIPRI’s Wezeman warned.

As for the European rearmament program, questions could arise about whether it is money well spent, especially given that these funds will have to be taken from other things.

The combined military spending of NATO members in Europe has exceeded Russia’s outlays since the end of the Cold War, he pointed out.

Is Russia really the threat that we make it out, that you need to spend an enormous amount of money in addition to what you already spend?

RT. com / ABC Flash Point News 2022.

2 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Wayne Gabler
Wayne Gabler
11-06-22 13:41

I missed the part where it pointed out that all the money involved comes in the form of an interest bearing loan from the Rothschild banks in Northern Europe.

Reply to  Wayne Gabler
11-06-22 14:04

comment image

11-06-22 13:43

People need houses, not missiles and rockets – in all Five Eyes countries.

Truth Hurts
Reply to  Noartifex
11-06-22 15:50

comment image

11-06-22 14:03

China should sell missiles to some poorer countries to take down those most expensive armaments of NATO. Maybe do Barter tradings or in some mitigating instances, just gifts them because anything they shoot will be your enemies. A lot of poorer countries will shoot them if they had the capabilities.