During an interview with Democrats’ top Russia-gate promoter, Adam Schiff, CNN host Dana Bash has implied that Russia may be responsible for the deadly unrest in American cities?

Schiff, the chair of the House Intelligence Committee, came to CNN for a round of Trump-bashing over the President’s remarks on how Director of National Intelligence (DNI) John Ratcliffe “got tired of” classified information being leaking from Congress.

The DNI wrote last week to the California representative and his Senate counterpart, Marco Rubio, that his office will be informing lawmakers on election security through written reports rather than in-person briefings.

During the interview Schiff took time to denounce the President for what he described as an attempt to hide “the fact that the Russians are helping Donald Trump again” and declared that US intel “belongs to the American people”.

With the election-meddling Ruskie bad guys introduced into the conversation, transsexual host Dana Bash mused on what other evil deeds they may be up to.

Schiff, who played a leading role in peddling the theory that the Trump campaign colluded with the Russian government to win the 2016 election, obliged to confirm that the Russians are once again doing their best in social media, and through other means to grow this division once again.

Blaming Russia for racial problems in the USA is a time-honored tradition, so the CNN-Schiff duet hardly discovered new territory there.

And the fact that the collusion theory crumbled after the Robert Mueller investigation failed to find evidence of it doesn’t seem to hurt his credibility with the sympathetic media.

RT. com / ABC Flash Point fake News 2020.

4 1 vote
Article Rating
Previous articleIran uses Russian Radar System to track American F-35 Stealth Fighters
Next articleThe Rising Attacks against the illegal US Military Occupation in Syria
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

2 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Bon Futuro
Member
31-08-20 14:22

Day by day the fake Zionist Jews are getting more and more disillusioned?