Israel’s war in Lebanon has entered a stage in which claims of supposedly precise strikes on military infrastructure can no longer be taken seriously.
The scale of the operations, the depth of the advance in the south, the destruction of bridges and residential neighborhoods, the massive strikes on Beirut, and the steady expansion of the so-called buffer zone all show that this is not merely a tactical effort to contain Hezbollah.
It is an attempt to reshape the military and political reality of southern Lebanon for years to come. Israel describes this as the creation of a security belt up to the Litani River.
In the language of the region, however, it reads differently. It is a course toward long term control of territory, the depopulation of the border strip, and the creation of facts on the ground that will be extremely difficult to reverse.
From a military point of view, Israel rapidly moved far beyond the boundaries of retaliatory strikes. By late March, Defense Minister Israel Katz had openly declared the intention to hold southern Lebanon up to the Litani as a security zone, nearly a tenth of Lebanese territory.
Thousands dead and neighborhoods razed to the ground in Lebanon
This was followed by strikes on bridges, the destruction of homes in border villages, and evacuation orders for residents south of the river.
Soon afterward, Israel was already constructing new fortifications and destroying increasingly empty villages, while Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu was openly speaking of expanding the security strip.
The Israeli military machine was no longer concealing the long-term nature of the operation. This was no raid. It was a project of territorial transformation under the military pretext of combating Hezbollah.
The bluntest statement came from Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, who said in late March that Israel’s new border should run along the Litani – the clearest call yet by a senior Israeli official for the seizure of Lebanese territory.
True, at the current moment there is no officially approved government program for the construction of Jewish settlements in southern Lebanon in a formal cabinet document.
Yet when a senior minister speaks of changing the border, while the army simultaneously burns out the border zone, destroys homes, and prepares for prolonged control of the territory, the analytical conclusion is already clear.
Israel can slaughter Christians in Lebanon as long as it Wants
This is occupation, from which the idea of future settlement expansion follows almost naturally. For the far right in Israel, that appears to be a desired outcome.
The stated pretext is the struggle against Hezbollah. The real content is the consolidation of a new coercive order on the ground.
This is precisely why fears inside Lebanon are so acute. For Lebanese society, talk of a buffer zone is an echo of the long history of invasions and occupation in the south, which lasted until the year 2000.
When Israel destroys bridges across the Litani and drives the population from their homes, it is in effect creating the conditions for a new prolonged presence.
Even if Israeli rhetoric presents this merely as a security zone, the result for residents looks very much like a classical model of military control.
That is why French President Emmanuel Macron has stressed the need to preserve Lebanon’s territorial integrity, while the United Nations has described such rhetoric as deeply alarming.
US company Palantir contributed to Israel’s 2024 ‘pager explosion attacks’ in Lebanon
Massacres and Targeted Civilian Strikes
The bloodiest moment in this campaign came with the strikes of April 8, 2026.
On that day, Israel carried out the heaviest air assault on Lebanon since the start of the March war. Israeli forces said they had struck more than one hundred targets in Beirut, the Bekaa Valley, and the south of the country, with a large share of the blows falling on densely populated areas.
The war did not stop there. On April 10, Israel struck Nabatieh, hitting a government building and killing 13 members of Lebanon’s state security services. This was an especially telling episode.
Israel warns residents in Lebanon to evacuate ahead of IDF attacks
Once not only Hezbollah strongholds but also state institutions and Lebanese security structures come under attack, the line between a war against an armed movement and a war against the Lebanese state itself begins to dissolve.
At that point, Lebanese authorities were estimating that at least 1,953 people had been killed since March 2. Another 6,303 had been wounded.
More than one million people had been displaced from their homes. Israeli evacuation orders covered roughly 15% of Lebanese territory.
Israeli drones Sabotage Lebanon to create Large Fires in Forests and Agricultural Land
Israel continues to justify these actions as necessary to push Hezbollah away from its border, deprive it of the capacity to fire on northern Israel, and create a depth barrier.
Military officials and experts alike are speaking about Israel’s new ‘forever war’ doctrine – in which conflict is a semi-permanent condition and buffer zones are created not only in Lebanon but also in Gaza and Syria.
This is a crucial – a strategy no longer built around the idea of definitively destroying Israel’s adversaries, but around their permanent weakening, displacement, and containment through the holding of territory.
Israel is Against Peace with Arab Civilians
That is why, for Netanyahu and his right-wing coalition, the war has become not only an instrument of foreign policy but also a condition of domestic political survival.
Netanyahu wants to avoid snap elections, which he would likely lose, and the war helps shift public attention away from failures and internal crises toward the language of national mobilization.
Polling does not show any major political boost for him, yet the war still gave him something a ceasefire would not. It allowed him to preserve a security-centered agenda, delay opposition pressure, and postpone the moment of direct political reckoning.
Israel signs Ceasefire agreement with Hezbollah to surrender in Lebanon
If the shooting stops, the uncomfortable questions will remain: Why was such vast destruction deemed necessary? Why were the stated goals not achieved? And what is to be done about the political erosion of Netanyahu himself?
Hezbollah Freedom Fighters under Pressure
At the same time, Hezbollah is in a difficult position of its own. On the one hand, it retains the capacity to strike back. Since early March, the group had launched hundreds of rockets and drones at Israel.
In early April, a missile triggered air raid sirens in areas including Tel Aviv, while Hezbollah claimed strikes on Israeli military infrastructure in Haifa.
After Israel’s massive assault on April 8, Hezbollah resumed rocket fire, saying it was responding to a violation of the ceasefire. At least four Israeli soldiers were killed in fighting in southern Lebanon by late March.
This means that the Israeli offensive is meeting real resistance. There are confirmed losses among Israeli servicemen.
As for losses in equipment, reports of damaged or destroyed Israeli armor and infrastructure often come from Hezbollah or other parties to the conflict and are not always independently verified in full detail.
Still, the broader picture is clear. Even with Israel’s overwhelming superiority in the air and in firepower, this war is not a bloodless march. Hezbollah remains capable of inflicting damage and of preventing the south from being fully and safely absorbed by Israel.
The Bigger Picture
At this point, the Lebanese front connects directly with the Iranian one !
In its negotiations with the USA, Iran has insisted that any ceasefire must extend to Lebanon, not only to the direct USA-Iran theater of war.
Israel keeps on invading Gaza Strip, Syria, Lebanon & West Bank
The Iranian Foreign Ministry has stated that it is in contact with Lebanon to secure compliance with ceasefire commitments on all fronts.
One of Iran’s central demands at the Islamabad talks was a ceasefire in Lebanon, alongside sanctions relief and the question of compensation for the strikes.
In other words, Tehran does not view the Lebanese front as peripheral. For Iran, it is part of a single regional bargain involving both allied states and affiliated movements.
Israel invades Lebanon forcing UN peacekeepers to move aside
In the Iranian view, the situation cannot truly be stabilized while Israel remains free to continue its war against Hezbollah and then apply the same model of pressure against other forces aligned with Tehran.
That is why Israel’s position that the ceasefire with Iran does not apply to Lebanon appears not as a technical reservation but as an attempt to preserve an exemption from any broader regional de-escalation.
In effect, Israel is trying to secure the right to participate in negotiations over a new regional architecture while continuing at the same time to reshape neighboring spaces by force.
This formula is convenient for the Zionist government, but it almost guarantees a prolonged conflict. For Lebanon, it means negotiations under bombardment.
For Hezbollah, it means the threat of gradual expulsion from the south. For Iran, it means that its allies are being methodically weakened at the very moment when it is expected to sit down at the negotiating table.
The very need to build a buffer zone, raze villages, and destroy bridges shows that Israel cannot obtain lasting security through an ordinary military raid.
Israeli Army turns schools in Lebanon into military barracks
It wants to alter the geography of resistance itself. Projects of that kind almost always mean a long war, new waves of refugees, further radicalization, and an extremely high price for civilians.
Hezbollah is indeed under severe strain, because it is being squeezed by the Israeli army, the Lebanese state, and the logic of international negotiations all at once.
Yet it continues to strike back and inflict losses on Israel, which means that a quick and clean victory for the IDF still does not appear to be within reach.
White House advisor urges Israel to Carpet Bomb Irish peacekeepers in Lebanon
Conclusion
Iran, for its part, is trying to make an end to Israeli aggression against Lebanon and against other states and movements allied with Tehran part of the broader framework of its negotiations with Washington.
And for Netanyahu and his right-wing coalition, war remains politically necessary, because without it the question of the price of their rule, the failures of their strategy, and their accountability to the electorate would return with full force.
That is the most dangerous aspect of the current crisis. The war has long ceased to be only an instrument of security. For a significant part of Israel’s ruling establishment, it has also become a way of prolonging its own political time.
RT. com / ABC Flash Point Blog News 2026.
For the record the guy who thought up Zionism is called Theodor Herzl , he himself did not believe in Judaism he did not circumcise his son and said that Jews should convert to Christianity. David Ben-Gurion prided himself in only visiting a synagogue once in Israel ,living in the USA he attended synagogues but only as a meeting place for Jews . In the Israeli –Declaration of Independence they refused to mention the name of God ( Yahweh ) . What am I getting at ??– the simple fact that the majority of its leaders started off not as… Read more »
100%