President Donald Trump has promised to block the United Nations from forming a ‘One World Government.’

While addressing the UN, Trump urged other nations to reject the push for a single globalist government and instead embrace patriotism and sovereignty.

In an historic speech earlier this year, Trump highlighted the achievements of his presidency, slamming America’s adversaries and rallying against the elites end goal of a globalist dystopia.

America is governed by Americans and we reject the ideology of globalism and we embrace the doctrine of patriotism.

According to Trump the United Nations must be a benevolent organization dedicated to pressuring the world community in the direction of peace, and to operating charitable programs to help the struggling, impoverished peoples of the world.

But, in 2015, the UN took a giant step towards the global government that was only hinted at in their first organizing document.

They issued a document entitled “Transforming Our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

What is meant by the term “sustainable?” The most often quoted definition comes from the UN World Commission on Environment and Development: “sustainable development is development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs.”

The earlier ideas and ideals of rights, freedom, equality, and justice are subsumed under meeting of needs and an explicit environmentalism which emphasizes preventing the depletion of scarce planetary resources.

The one-worlders of the 1950’s and early 1960s are now in the UN driver’s seat, and they have made their move.

The overlay of Marxist talk about “meeting needs” has moved to center stage.  The UN has assigned itself a time frame for moving forward in its plan for planetary hegemony.

The sustainability ideal is not wedded to a Christian world view; instead, individual liberty is submerged in a scientifically determined collectivist mindset with final decisions in the hands of the devilish, all-knowing Big Brothers.

They never discuss incompetence and corruption, twin brothers in the family of venality.

The relevance of the individual is downplayed. It is being put forward by a UN that is no longer pro-western, a much larger body than existed in 1945.

Will you accept it, or is it time, more than ever before, to begin rethinking the US membership in that unsustainable body?

Explain Life. com / ABC Flash Point News 2018.

4 1 vote
Article Rating
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments