A Harvard Study proves that unvaccinated children pose no risk to the public, because immunologists destroy mandatory vaccine logic in open letter.

The Boston scientists wrote the letter in the hope that it will correct several common misconceptions about vaccines in order to help you formulate a fair and balanced understanding that is supported by accepted vaccine theory and new scientific findings.

It is often stated that those who choose not to vaccinate their children for reasons of conscience endanger the rest of the public.

And this is the rationale behind most of the legislation to end vaccine exemptions currently being considered by federal and state legislators country-wide.

Vaccines that cannot prevent transmission of disease either because they are not designed to prevent the transmission of infection (rather, they are intended to prevent disease symptoms), or because they are for non-communicable diseases.

A person who is not vaccinated with IPV, DTaP, HepB, and Hib vaccines due to reasons of conscience poses no extra danger to the public than a person who is.  No discrimination is warranted.

A recent study done in Ontario, Canada, established that vaccinations actually lead to an emergency room visits for 1 in 168 children following their 12-month vaccination appointment and for 1 in 730 children following their 18-month vaccination appointment.


When the risk of an adverse event requiring an ER visit after well-baby vaccinations is demonstrably so high, vaccination must remain a choice for parents !

Because parents may understandably be unwilling to assume this immediate risk in order to protect their children from diseases that are generally considered mild or that their children may never be exposed to.

Neon Nettle.com / AB Flash Point Health News 2018.

5 2 votes
Article Rating
Previous articleTurkey ignores US Sanctions and continues Trading Oil with Iran
Next articleDutch Government bans Islamic Face Veils in Public Places
Notify of

Inline Feedbacks
View all comments