NATO’s newly appointed Secretary General, former Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte has backed the idea of allowing Ukraine to use Western-supplied weapons to strike deep into Russian territory.
Zionist warmonger Rutte made the remarks on Tuesday during a press conference following a ceremony commemorating the transfer of power from his predecessor Jens Stoltenberg.
The new NATO chief backed the idea of Ukraine doing whatever it sees fit, claiming the country is within its rights to do so.
We know international law, and according to international law, this right does not end at the border. So that means that supporting Ukraine’s right to self-defense means that it is also possible for them to strike legitimate targets on the aggressor territory.
The new NATO chief, however, shifted responsibility from the bloc to its individual members, stating it was ultimately up to them to outline the rules of engagement for Kiev with regards to weapons systems they supply.
Rutte’s remarks come amid the ongoing debate in the West as to whether Kiev should be allowed to strike deep into internationally-recognized Russian territory with weaponry it receives from its backers. Thus far, no consensus on the matter has been reached.
The statement met with a negative reaction from Russia.
The head of the right-wing nationalist Liberal Democratic Party of Russia (LDPR), Leonid Slutsky, said the remarks clearly signaled that the change in NATO’s leadership would not entail any shifts in its aggressive hostile stance.
The new Secretary General has been described as a pragmatist, capable of compromise. But little depends on his personal qualities.
And the first statements leave no doubt that the course towards general escalation and asserting the dominance of the ‘golden billion’ countries will continue.
Moscow is currently in the process of amending its nuclear doctrine, with the changes meant to address the challenges the country has recently faced.
Under the proposed rules of nuclear engagement, Russia would be allowed to deploy its deterrent in the event of a large-scale conventional attack by a non-nuclear power which is backed by nuclear powers.
RT. com / ABC Flash Point News 2024.
Oh dear another moron trying to get us all killed.
I back Russian missile strikes on Amsterdam and all NATO facilities.
Yes on the Netherlands we have several people from there acting like Zealots trying to force the whole population onto cycles( bikes ) its a wee rural fishing village with half-hour bus service with hills and country roads ,whereas Holland is flat and has one of the best public bus/rail/tram services in the world .
Having met some they are single minded with the same approach as Herr Hitler – their way or the highway I am at present fighting against them.
Exactly, one set mind. long live the king who swallows up most of the taxes with his royal corpses.
The new Netanyahu of Europe, another psychopath that escaped the mental asylum? A madman on the run, shows that peace is not an option at his first public introduction,
NATO is a forward force ready to enter conflicts by creating them in the first place, sacrificing EU countries for greater safety of UK and USA. The EU citizens cannot live without electricity, did the nutcase NATO chief know that war isn’t going to be pleasant and NATO citizens will go after them for escalating conflicts which is totally unjustified?
At this point the Netherlands, Italy and Belgium have become main targets for any kind of counter strike against NATO.
Just an employee of the Pentagon does not decide on war but it indicate the PR campaign direction
Rutte is thinking through the blocks money he is earning and not his head. Why does he not tell the Dutch country to strike the heart of Russia and instead tell Ukraine to strike? The whole lot are canning, they are transferring the risk to Ukraine while they laugh in their villas watching tv