JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon has explicitly rejected Democratic congresswoman Rashida Tlaib’s demand that his bank swear off financing future oil and gas projects, arguing the move would send the country into a death spiral.

During a House Financial Services Committee hearing on Wednesday, Jamie Dimon warned rejecting any future fossil fuel energy projects would spell America’s doom.

https://i0.wp.com/stillbuddy.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Top-10-largest-banks-in-the-US.png?w=696&ssl=1

JP Morgan, along with the other six largest banks in the USA, had committed to wind down their emissions from lending and investment activities in order to align with pathways to net-zero in 2050.

The only way to get there, she claimed, was to veto all fossil fuel projects going forward.

Does your bank have any policy against funding new oil and gas projects? Absolutely not, because that would be the road to hell for America.

https://i0.wp.com/www.bostonherald.com/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Biden_Student_Loans_86923-1.jpg?w=696&ssl=1

Dimon’s opposition to President Joe Biden’s controversial student loan forgiveness plan, called it badly done earlier in the six-hour marathon hearing.

The bank executive wasn’t just failing to help to relieve these customers by canceling their debts – he didn’t care about working-class people and front-line communities like ours that are facing huge amounts of high rates of asthma, respiratory issues, and so much more.

Three other CEOs present at the hearing followed Dimon’s lead, refusing to close the door on their oil and gas lending businesses, but added that they were also investing in renewable energy projects.

https://i0.wp.com/static01.nyt.com/images/2019/09/30/opinion/30seiff1/30Seiff1-videoSixteenByNine3000.jpg?w=696&ssl=1

We are living through a climate crisis today and a commitment to net zero requires a commitment to ending fossil fuel financing. Otherwise at the end we’re going to pay the cost of the public health impact.

The mainstream climate science holds that averting the worst effects of climate change requires keeping global temperature under 1.5 degrees Celsius above pre-industrial levels.

Net zero is criticized for implying that merely offsetting emissions can keep the temperature down, allowing the producers of those emissions to continue business as usual so long as they pay their dues to the climate authorities.

RT. com / ABC Flash Point News 2022.

4 2 votes
Article Rating
Subscribe
Notify of
guest

5 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Canon_Ball
Canon_Ball
Member
22-09-22 21:10

Germany is the test bed for Road To Hell. Talib is a fruitcake by the way. Completely uneducated and she represents the mediocrity that is Washington today.

Ignore
Ignore
Member
Reply to  Canon_Ball
22-09-22 21:13

comment image

Canon_Ball
Canon_Ball
Member
22-09-22 21:10

Another defender of status quo for the rich and their fear to lose some of their wealth that separates them from the population and of their economic powers over the government to control global exploitation.

Lex44
Lex44
Member
22-09-22 21:12

The Democrat energy plan is that everything goes electric. But they haven’t figured out how to make the electric grid support that.