Jordan condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s plans about establishing a Palestinian state in Saudi Arabia, deeming them incendiary calls and a violation of international law.
The Israeli government continues its provocative policies and statements that undermine the sovereignty of nations and the principles of international law, Foreign Ministry spokesman Sufian al-Qudah said in a statement.
He stressed Jordan’s absolute rejection of these provocative statements, which reflect an exclusionary and inciting ideology hostile to peace and contribute to further escalation in the region.
The spokesman reaffirmed Jordan’s full solidarity with Saudi Arabia and called on the international community to condemn and denounce these irresponsible remarks.
The Israeli government will not succeed in covering up the truth that the continuation of occupation and the violation of Palestinian rights is the root cause of the conflict in the region.
Qudah called for an immediate halt to all Israeli escalation measures in the occupied West Bank, including the ongoing incursions, settlement expansion, and confiscation of Palestinian lands.
The Palestinian people remain committed to their land and their right to establish an independent and sovereign state based on the borders of June 4, 1967, with East Jerusalem as its capital, stressing that peace, security, and stability cannot be achieved without this.
On Thursday, Netanyahu suggested that Palestinians should establish their state in Saudi Arabia rather than in their own homeland, dismissing any notion of Palestinian sovereignty.
The Saudis can create a Palestinian state in Saudi Arabia; they have a lot of land over there. Saudi Arabia on Sunday strongly condemned Netanyahu’s statements and emphasized the right of the Palestinian people to their land.
On 4 February, US President Donald Trump said Washington would take over Gaza and resettle Palestinians elsewhere under an extraordinary redevelopment plan that he claimed could turn the enclave into the Riviera of the Middle East.
His proposal was met with wide condemnations from the Palestinians, Arab countries, and many other nations across the world, including Canada, France, Germany, and Britain.
Middle East Monitor / ABC Flash Point News 2025.
The eventual Greater Palestine means seeding various locations in MENA, but not as refugees, which results in their isolation from the various populations of host nations. Sooner or later, the UN will have a budget crisis, that will mean cutting back its budget on elephantiasis programs. As the world’s population at 8 billion and growing continues, the emphasis will be on those actually physically in need, instead of those thirsty ideologically.
When the French left Morocco, Tunisia, Algeria, these three countries went back to their own indigenous population. Do you have a valid reason to give me why Palestine should not go back to its indigenous population 100%?
Do you really believe that the European Jews known as the Ashkenazim have the goddamn right to be there considering that they are in fact 100% alien to the region? Stop your parasitic existence on Arab land!
How about a Palestinian state in Mar-a-Lago? I am sure Trump would be happy to host them all and provide copious quantities of the most delicious chocolate cake they have ever tasted. Being Florida, they can also keep their guns.